Garvies Point Project: Matters Of Fact


With the upcoming sale of the waterfront property and our efforts to issue bonds for public improvement at no liability to our taxpayers, Glen Cove could be in its strongest financial position in more than a decade. Our priority continues to be ensuring our taxpayers receive the high quality services they deserve without the burden of tax increases.

I am certain that with the sale of the waterfront property we will be headed in the right financial direction. And, it’s equally important to understand that without this project and the new revenues it will bring, there will be an increase in taxes, a reduction in city services and potential layoffs.

Bond Buyer Validates Glen Cove’s Financial Solution to Fund the Waterfront Infrastructure

A recent story in the Bond Buyer, a respected and independent newspaper that covers the municipal bond market, validated the upside of Glen Cove’s financial approach.

The article highlights the financial benefits of the plan and quotes Moody’s analyst Cristin Jacoby who said, “They are expected to get things right with fund balances if everything goes well with the waterfront development. Overall the long-term boom to their economy could be huge.”  Further in the article Jacoby added, “They have been moving positively toward balancing fund operations, but still have some challenges ahead. To the extent that the redevelopment project leads to new revenue and positive property values we would likely consider it to be a major credit strength.”

Correcting Misinformation about the Glen Cove Waterfront

Every day we hear and see incorrect, fabricated or exaggerated information about the waterfront project. Here are facts and the insights so our residents can draw their own conclusions.

The misinformed say: The city will incur $115 million in new debt

Fact: The bond offering to build parks and other public amenities at the waterfront will not be a city or IDA debt. The risk of repayment is exclusively the bond holders. At no time would the residents and the city have any obligation to repay it. It will also not affect our bond rating.

The misinformed say: The Garvies Point waterfront site is not fit environmentally for redevelopment

Fact: The Environmental Protection Agency, New York State Department of Environmental Control and other governmental agencies have spent $120 million on the remediation of this Super Fund site over the past 20 years. Final approval on the last parcel will be forthcoming in the next few weeks. Upon the issuance of the final approval, the property will be deemed ready for development and public use. After 20 years of remediation our creek is cleaner than ever. Our waterfront, which was once a toxic waste land, will finally be clean and ready to return to our tax roll. The city, DEC, EPA and other agencies have been diligent in their oversight and would not allow this property to be developed until it is absolutely safe for the public and future residents of the project.

The misinformed say: Construction will last for 10 years

Fact:  Under previous plans, that may have been the case. However, now with the reduction in the number and heights of several of the buildings, there will be an expedited construction schedule, lasting about five to six years. Important for the bonding and other city protections, during the first two years all of the public amenities including parks, amphitheater, esplanade, dog park, playgrounds and more, totaling 28 acres of public recreational and open space, will be built first for all to enjoy.

The misinformed say: Buildings are too tall and will block the view of neighboring communities.

Fact: The building heights and plan for the redevelopment of the waterfront have been reduced from the original concept of multiple 16 story buildings with few public amenities to its current footprint, which reduced the building footprint by 23 percent and increased the public amenities and park space to 28 acres. The western parcel (closest to the harbor), which in 2011 was approved with two 12-story buildings and two four-story buildings, has been redesigned with one 11-story building with stepped back twin towers to enhance view corridors, and one five-story building to allow for the addition of three additional acres of park space.

The misinformed say: There will not be enough revenue to cover the cost of city and other public services resulting from the project.

Fact: This could not be further from the truth. The city ensured during negotiations with the redeveloper that each tax jurisdiction will receive tax and other revenue from the project after payment of the bond, which far exceeds their cost of services. This starts on the first day of the project.

It is estimated that over the next 40 years the city will receive $225 million with expenses of $51 million. The school will receive a total of $292 million with expenses of $46 million. The county will receive $96 million with expenses of $6 million and the library will receive $8 million with no additional expenses.

The misinformed say: 399 ferry trips weekly
Fact: The truth is that there would be about eight to 10 ferry trips per day during the week and fewer on the weekend.

Previous articleClifford E. Jennett
Next articleThe Glen Cove Community?
Glen Cove Record Pilot welcomes letters from the community. The views expressed in letters to the editor are not necessarily those of the publisher or Anton Media Group.


  1. Thanks for clearing That up Reggie. If you did not run against the “queensification” of Glen Cove and then basically act as a puppet for this ill conceived project, you would have never had to do this in the first place. Shameful, selling out the entire North Shore so that you can say you made this happen and saved the city. The reason why this lunacy is now moving forward is that they finally found the person in office desperate enough to sell out the school, the city, and the county. Great job. Nero fiddled as Rome burned.

  2. Thank you Mr. Mayor for clarifying all the details on the Garvies Point project. I am sure that RXR is very excited to have this project begin next year. It appears that RXR finally found a Mayor that was desperate enough to sell out the city, the schools, the county and the North Shore of Long Island. Great job! What the misinformed (and apparently) a vast majority of the residents in the community fail to comprehend is why was it necessary for RXR to offer money directly to the Glen Cove School district? On the surface, it seems like a bribe or shall we call it an incentive to vote their way? Why were the lawsuits against the City suddenly dismissed shortly after the legislature voted to approve the tax abatements? I hope you enjoy your new position with RXR once you get voted out of office in the next election. Foisting this disaster on the North Shore is on your shoulders. Nero fiddled as Rome burned.

  3. Mr. Spinello – The opposition is not misinformed. We are very well informed. Our information is well researched and our opinions well-reasoned. Unlike your very own set of “facts,” which is all speculation, and only best-case scenarios. Where is the stress test? Your plan is full of magical thinking. Your “supporters” tow the “party line” and are now drunk on your super sweet Kool-Aid.

Leave a Reply